Back to Blog
Yet, achieving this in a satisfying but unforeseeable way can be much harder than it seems.Įndings that appear fabricated can often leave the audience feeling swindled. Doing so requires some sort of resolution to the plot’s conflict. An ending needs to provide the audience with a sense of closure. Writing a good ending is often the hardest nut to crack. This means that the ending, maybe more than any other part of the film, leaves us pondering the meaning of the film’s message. The film’s ending is where these themes are perhaps most present. Ultimately, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind seeks to discover the value of such pain and why a life of pleasure in toto will not necessarily make us a happier species. Yet, as the film unfolds, we begin to question the extent to which ignorance can amount to bliss. With the capability of completely erasing an ex-lover from one’s memory, Lacuna claims to provide its customers with the freedom to move on with their lives. He imagines a world, made possible by Lacuna’s technological ingenuity, in which the pain of a broken heart need not be felt. Kaufman explores this inevitable human experience through science-fiction. The film reflects upon the burden of heartbreak, that excruciating process of separating from someone who previously completed you.The story tells of the turbulent relationship between Jim Carrey’s ‘Joel’ and Kate Winslet’s ‘Clementine’. Released in 2004, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is written by Charlie Kaufman and directed by Michel Gondry. The Eternal Sunshine Ending’s Philosophical Commentary.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |